|  |  | schools participating in a large-scale school improvement program—the Quality  School Improvement Project—in Hong Kong. Using  cluster analysis, schools were successfully classified into “high”, “medium”,  and “low” school’s capacity in terms of principal leadership, school culture,  teacher empowerment, and (perceived) students’ attitudes to learning.  Subsequent analyses provided additional support for the validity of the  classification and the results converged to demonstrate that schools with  different capacity had differentiated improvement agenda and needs for external  support. Implications for school improvement and educational reform in the Hong Kong school context were discussed |  |