Page 51 - 50th
P. 51

Framework for the Project  School Dimension  enhanced, like leaders’ positioning of schools, their
           curricular knowledge and professional guidance to
     Forging shared school visions  teachers. The research is still in its infancy. Further
           research on successful schools and leadership
     Communicate school goals   for  shared     practices will help us to infer good models for
     understanding
           empowering leaders in achieving organizational
     Motivating colleagues to participate in      goals.
 Basic leadership       decision making
 Practices        To further strengthen the CUSP as the leading
     Enhancing teacher capacity through     university-school partnership agency in Hong Kong,
     Setting Directions      professional development  teaching resources and improvement consultations
 Leadership        Building collaborative and self-reflection     Student  from pre-primary to senior secondary local schools
 Development      Developing People      culture  Learning  and Mainland schools will be provided. The CUSP
 Programme  will also strengthen its status as a regional education
     Redesigning Organization  hub by seeking effective ways to extend the networks
 Class Dimension
     Improving instructional      with scholars and talents from China and nearby
     Programme      Instructional design for promoting whole   regions.
     child development

     Refining teaching practice through diverse
     strategies and action research

     Monitoring and evaluating teaching
     effectiveness

     Building relationship with parents


 45
 45  A total of 50 schools were recruited as Project   2. Micro level - The school development team   4646
 Schools and Associated Schools. To ensure a wide   supported principals/ senior teachers/ teachers
 representation of schools, the project recruited   to act as curriculum leaders, and sought to align
 schools (i) with different school sizes (ii) with students   curriculum with Annual School Plan. Through
 from different socio-economic backgrounds (iii) from   the course of collegial planning and peer
 different districts. Priority was given to kindergartens   class observations, intellectual stimulations, we
 that were in greater need of external support to   observed significant models of good practices and
 empower the curriculum leaders. It was hoped that   beliefs considered fundamental to organizational
 such a diversity of schools would allow the project to   growth.  References:
 generate different models of leadership for references
 in the future.   To consolidate leadership experiences and to keep   Education Bureau Kindergarten Inspection Section (2012) Report on Quality Review (2007-2012)
 track of professional development, a portfolio was
 Other than centralized workshops, the CUHK school   kept for knowledge management and reflection for   Leithwood, K. and Riehl, C (2003) “What we know about successful leadership” A Report by Division A of AERA National
 development team provided regular on-site support   further improvement.  College for School Leadership
 to the Project Schools. Consultancy included the
 following levels:  CUSP also conducted research in this project to   Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational school leadership: A review, Leadership and Policy in Schools,
           Leithwood, K & Jantzi, D, 2005, Linking leadership to student learning: The contribution of leader efficacy, Educational
 evaluate leadership effectiveness in terms of a   Administration Quarterly, 44, 496-528.
 1.  Macro level - Emphasis was placed on helping   leader’s practices and its impact on student learning.
 leaders revisit the school context; prioritize   Compelling evidence suggested that most schools   Leithwood, K. and others, (2008). “Successful School Leadership: What It is and How It Influences Pupil Learning” (Nottingham:
 school developmental needs; set direction and   leaders perceived their basic leadership practices as   National College For School Leadership, p. 15.)
 objectives; design strategic plans and appropriate   positive to student learning. Though school leaders
 success indicators; and conduct self-evaluations to   agreed that the project significantly contributed to   Scottish Executive (2004), Ambitious, Excellent Schools – Our Agenda for Action, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education
 evaluate school effectiveness. In setting directions,   building up the professional capacity of leaders and   Department
 leaders were encouraged to articulate a vision   teachers and hence brought about positive changes
 fostering the acceptance of shared goals and   to student learning, this dimension of our research
 creating high performance expectations.  suggested that there are still a lot of issues to be
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56